CT-TAE Premium Files Updated Aug-2024 Practice Valid Exam Dumps Question
Practice with CT-TAE Dumps for Test Automation Engineer Certified Exam Questions & Answer
NEW QUESTION # 15
You have inherited a TAS that is working well it uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS is working across several projects and has a multiple library of keywords, categorised by project. The individual project teams maintain these keyword scripts.
Based only on the given information, what is the MOST significant risk for the TAS?
- A. Because the keyword scripts are maintained by different teams, there is a likelihood that good coding standards are not followed
- B. The level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to maintain
- C. The keyword driven scripts may become out of date if not maintained
- D. New projects may not work as well with the TAS as the current projects
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most significant risk for the Test Automation System (TAS) in this scenario is related to the level of abstraction and the departure of the automation architect. The architect's role is crucial in designing and maintaining the architecture of the TAS. Their departure can lead to challenges in understanding the system's design and making necessary updates or changes. The level of abstraction means that the system is designed in a way that may not be easily understood without the architect's insight, which can make maintenance difficult.
This risk is compounded when the TAS is used across several projects, each with its own library of keywords, which requires a deep understanding of the system's architecture to manage effectively.
References = This answer is based on the principles outlined in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which discusses the importance of maintainability and the risks associated with high levels of abstraction in test automation architectures12. The syllabus also emphasizes the role of the automation architect in ensuring the long-term success of the TAS2.
NEW QUESTION # 16
Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writing the automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight's repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allows checking a webpage load every seconds until a timeout value
- A. Changing the wait mechanism to explicit hard-coded waits
- B. Establishing an error recovery process for TAS and SUT
- C. Implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity
- D. Changing the scripting approach to data-driven scripting
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a keyword-driven framework, especially when dealing with a web application, having a large set of highly specific keywords can lead to redundancy and inefficiency. Implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity can help reduce the number of repeated instances of identical sequences of keywords, as identified by the static analysis tool. This approach promotes reusability and maintainability of test scripts, making the test automation suite more robust and easier to manage. It also aligns with the principles of modularity and abstraction, which are key in test automation engineering.
References = The ISTQB CT-TAE materials emphasize the importance of maintaining a manageable level of abstraction in keyword-driven frameworks to ensure that the automated tests are efficient, maintainable, and provide clear insights into the SUT's behavior12.
NEW QUESTION # 17
In order to achieve re-use of a TAS, where SHOULD the design for reuse occur?
- A. At the TAA level
- B. At the TAS level
- C. At the code level
- D. At the framework level.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The design for reuse of a Test Automation Solution (TAS) should primarily occur at the Test Automation Architecture (TAA) level. This is because the TAA defines the overall structure and design patterns that will be used throughout the TAS lifecycle. By focusing on reuse at the TAA level, it ensures that the test automation is designed with reuse in mind from the outset, which can increase the ability for reuse across different layers of the TAA.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) certification materials emphasize the importance of designing for reuse at the TAA level. It is noted that while reuse aspects are already settled when the TAA is defined, the TAS can help increase the ability for reuse. This information is corroborated by discussions and consensus in the professional community, as seen in the resources provided by ISTQB and other educational platforms12.
NEW QUESTION # 18
Consider a TAS deployed into production. The SUT is a web application and the test suite consists of a set of automated regression tests developed via GUI. A keyword-driven framework has been adopted for automating the regression tests. The tests are based on identification at low-levels of the web page components (e.g class indexes, tab sequence indexes and coordinates) in the next planned release the SUT will be subject to significant corrective maintenance (bug-fixes) and evolution (new features) Maintenance costs to update the test scripts should be as low as possible and the scripts must be highly reusable.
Which of the following statements is most likely to be TRUE?
- A. The keyword-driven framework introduces a level abstraction that is too high and makes it difficult what really happens
- B. The keyword-driven framework is not suitable, it would be better to adopt a structured-scripting approach
- C. The total execution time of the automated regression test suite will decrease for each planned release.
- D. False positive errors are likely to occur when running the automated tests on the new releases without modifying the test
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 19
A SUT has an existing automated test suite.
Which of the following statements relating to the introduction of new features in the SUT is TRUE?
- A. It is generally more difficult to automate test cases for a new feature as the development has not yet started
- B. Automated tests are not affected by the introduction of a new feature and running them against the new SUT is a waste of effort
- C. The introduction of a new feature could require updates or additions to the testware components
- D. The test automation engineer should work with the business analysts to ensure the new feature is testable
Answer: C
Explanation:
When a new feature is introduced to the System Under Test (SUT), it often necessitates changes to the existing automated test suite. This is because the test suite must now account for the new functionality and ensure that it works as expected, in addition to not breaking existing features. The testware, which includes scripts, data, and configurations, may need to be updated or new components added to cover the new feature adequately. This ensures that the automated tests remain effective and can validate that the new feature integrates well with the existing system.
References = The answer and explanation are based on the principles outlined in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which emphasizes the importance of maintaining and updating testware in response to changes in the SUT. The ISTQB documents provide detailed guidance on how to approach test automation when new features are added to a system123.
NEW QUESTION # 20
You are planning the pilot for an in-house developed Test Automation solution (TAS).
Which two of the following would be important steps to take as part of the planning process?
a) Review your organisation's current projects and identify which one would be most suitable to pilot the TAS.
b) Ensure that the developers will provide the necessary commitment for the TAS deployment activities.
c) Run a series of training workshops for new users of the TAS before they are asked to use it.
d) Develop a project plan for the pilot and reserve the necessary budget and resources for its implementation.
e) Ask the developers to provide any missing functionality during the deployment activities.
- A. a and b
- B. c and d
- C. b and d
- D. c and e
Answer: B
Explanation:
When planning the pilot for an in-house developed Test Automation Solution (TAS), it is essential to conduct training workshops for new users (Option C) and develop a detailed project plan while reserving the necessary budget and resources (Option D). Training workshops ensure that the users are adequately prepared to use the TAS effectively, contributing to the success of the pilot by minimizing user-related issues and enhancing the adoption rate. A comprehensive project plan with allocated budget and resources establishes a structured framework for the pilot, ensuring that all necessary aspects, such as objectives, scope, timeline, and success criteria, are clearly defined and understood. These steps are critical in preparing the organization for the pilot, mitigating risks, and setting a clear path toward evaluating the TAS's effectiveness and potential benefits for the organization.
NEW QUESTION # 21
As the TAE, you are working with the organisation's Test Manager to decide which external metrics and which internal metrics should be gathered for the new TAS.
Which of the following represents the BEST internal metric that would help measure the quality of the TAS and the number of problems associated with the TAS?
- A. The number of hours of manual test effort saved by implementing a TAS
- B. A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code
- C. A measure of how many automated tests pass and fail
- D. The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT
Answer: D
Explanation:
The best internal metric to measure the quality of the Test Automation System (TAS) and the number of problems associated with it would be the defect density within the TAS automation code. This metric provides insight into the robustness and reliability of the automation code itself. A lower defect density indicates higher quality and fewer problems, while a higher defect density may signal the need for improvements in the automation code. This metric is internal because it pertains directly to the quality of the TAS rather than its impact on external processes. References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and other ISTQB materials emphasize the importance of internal metrics such as defect density to assess the quality and effectiveness of the TAS123.
NEW QUESTION # 22
You have inherited a TAS that is working well it uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS is working across several projects and has a multiple library of keywords, categorised by project. The individual project teams maintain these keyword scripts.
Based only on the given information, what is the MOST significant risk for the TAS?
- A. Because the keyword scripts are maintained by different teams, there is a likelihood that good coding standards are not followed
- B. The level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to maintain
- C. The keyword driven scripts may become out of date if not maintained
- D. New projects may not work as well with the TAS as the current projects
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 23
What is NOT a factor in considering when you are asked to ensure an effective transition from manual to automated tests?
- A. Complexity to automate the manual test cases
- B. The look and feel of the SUT
- C. Correctness of test data and test cases
- D. The controllability of the SUT
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 24
Which of the following is an important success factor for any significant automation project?
- A. The SUT is self-documenting
- B. The TAA must be designed for testability.
- C. The SUT must be designed for testability
- D. The TAA is self-documenting
Answer: C
Explanation:
For any significant automation project, a critical success factor is that the System Under Test (SUT) must be designed for testability (Option C). Testability refers to the ease with which a system can be tested, which includes aspects like accessibility to test interfaces, observability of outputs, controllability of inputs, and the system's ability to be put into a known state for testing. A SUT designed with testability in mind facilitates the creation and execution of automated tests, enhancing the effectiveness, reliability, and coverage of the Test Automation Architecture (TAA). This design consideration directly impacts the efficiency of testing activities, reducing the time and effort required to achieve comprehensive test coverage and identify defects.
NEW QUESTION # 25
You are using a gTAA to create a TAS for a project. The TAS is aimed specifically at automating a suit of existing manual test cases for standalone desktop applications. All the interfaces between the TAS and SUT will be from the CUI of the application.
Which of the following layers of the gTAA should you focus on for the TAS?
- A. The Test Definition layer
- B. The Test Execution layer
- C. The test Generation layer
- D. The Test Adaption layer
Answer: D
Explanation:
In the context of using a gTAA for creating a TAS, particularly for automating a suite of existing manual test cases for standalone desktop applications with interfaces from the CUI of the application, the focus should be on the Test Adaption layer. This layer is crucial as it deals with adapting the test cases to the specific interfaces of the System Under Test (SUT). It involves creating the necessary mappings and interactions with the CUI, ensuring that the automated tests can effectively communicate with the application as a user would through the CUI.
References = The importance of the Test Adaption layer in the gTAA is highlighted in resources that discuss the Generic Test Automation Architecture and its application in test automation projects12. These resources provide insights into how each layer of the gTAA serves a specific purpose in the development of a TAS, with the Test Adaption layer being key for interfacing with the SUT3.
NEW QUESTION # 26
You are implementing a TAS for a system that has been live for over three years, using a hybrid waterfall and agile lifecycle. Live updates are made on a monthly basis.
There is no test team, with developers designing and executing unit and integration tests with some degree of automation and business analysts designing and executing manual tests at the system level. No formal test process exists, although the system has proved relatively stable for most of the time.
Unfortunately, the last two monthly releases were problematic with regression defects found in production.
Your priority is the automation of functional regression tests at the system level, the budget for this has been approved by project stakeholders.
The Business Analysts have identified which test cases are most suitable for regression. You must use the organisation's long standing commercial automation tool which has passed a proof of concept in the platform for the system in question.
Which of the following suitability criteria needs the MOST attention for the TAS?
- A. Maturity of the test process
- B. Technical planning in support of ROI analysis
- C. Frequency of use.
- D. Compatibility and tool support
Answer: A
Explanation:
The maturity of the test process needs the most attention because it is fundamental to the successful implementation of a Test Automation System (TAS). Given that there is no formal test process and the system has experienced regression defects, focusing on the maturity of the test process will ensure that the test automation is built on a solid foundation. This involves establishing a structured test process that integrates with both the waterfall and agile lifecycle, ensuring that the automated tests are maintainable, reusable, and provide effective coverage. Without a mature test process, the automation efforts may not align with the business requirements and could result in ineffective testing or further regression issues.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and study resources emphasize the importance of a mature test process when implementing test automation. It is essential for ensuring that the automation aligns with the test strategy and provides value to the organization1234.
NEW QUESTION # 27
Consider the following example of TAS metrics.
Time to execute automated tests
Speed and efficiency of TAS components
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- A. A and b are both external TAS metric
- B. A and B are both internal TAS metrics
- C. A is and external TAS metric and b is an internal TAS metric
- D. A is an internal TAS metric and B is an external TAS metric
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 28
You have implemented a keyword-driven scripting framework, which uses a test execution tool to run the tests. This has been in use for the past year and all of the teams now use this framework as the standard approach for test execution.
The teams all work on different aspects of the SUT and they have all experienced significant benefits in the use of this scripting framework. However, on closer examination, you have discovered that there are numerous instances where the teams have the same functionality to test but are using different keywords.
One of your objectives for improvement is to create consistency among the teams.
What is the BEST way to handle this situation?
- A. Create a central library of keywords and associated definitions for each team to use.
- B. Provide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.
- C. Move to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.
- D. Do nothing, each team are working in isolation and they are all experiencing significant benefits in the way they are currently working.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Establishing a central library of keywords and associated definitions ensures consistency across different teams working on the same System Under Test (SUT). This approach not only promotes uniformity in keyword usage but also facilitates better communication, maintenance, and scalability of the test automation framework. By having a shared repository of keywords, teams can avoid duplication of effort and reduce the risk of discrepancies in test implementation. This centralization aligns with the ISTQB's principles of efficient test automation architecture and management.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) documents and training resources emphasize the importance of a consistent and maintainable test automation framework. The creation of a central library of keywords is a recommended practice to achieve this consistency, as it supports the definition, implementation, and execution layers of a generic test automation architecture12.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Which of the following BEST describes why it is important to separate test definition from test execution in a TAA?
- A. It allows developing steps of the test process without being closely tied to the SUT interface.
- B. It allows specify test cases without being closely tied to the tool to run them against the SUT
- C. It allow choosing different paradigms (e.g event-driven) for the interaction TAS and SUT
- D. It allows testers to find more defects on the SUT
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 30
You have been asked to implement test automation for a project that is not meeting its deadlines. After further analysis you discover that the manual testers are not able to keep up with the new feature testing because the regression testing is taking 75% of their time. As a result, the new features are being released with many defects and customers are complaining about the quality.
Given this information, what metric SHOULD you be tracking to show the value of test automation for this project?
- A. Equivalent Manual Test Effort for the automated tests.
- B. Percentage of builds accepted/rejected by the automated tests.
- C. Number of defects found by test automation.
- D. Percentage of code covered by the test automation.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 31
Which of the following statements BEST describe aspects of the SUT to consider when designing a TAA?
- A. All the interaction between SUT and TAS should be logged with the highest level of detail
- B. All the interface of the SUT affected by the tests should be controllable by the TAA
- C. All the internal test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release
- D. All the external test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release
Answer: B
Explanation:
When designing a Test Automation Architecture (TAA), it is crucial to ensure that all interfaces of the System Under Test (SUT) that are affected by the tests can be controlled by the TAA. This control allows for the execution of test cases, the simulation of various conditions under which the SUT operates, and the verification of the SUT's behavior under test. The ability to control these interfaces ensures that the automated tests are effective and can interact with the SUT as required.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus outlines the importance of control over the SUT interfaces in the context of test automation. It discusses the technical considerations for the SUT when designing a TAA, including the need for interfaces to be controllable to enable effective and efficient automated testing1.
NEW QUESTION # 32
Your functional regression test automation suite ran successfully for the first two sprints and no failures were encountered during the runs. The automation suite records the status of each test case as either 'pass' or 'fail' and has excellent recovery capability built in.
For the third sprint, the TAS log reported several test cases with a status of 'fail'. You investigated each test case and found that most failures were due to a defect in one of the keyword scripts, rather than in the SUT.
For those where the failure was in the SUT, defect reports were raised but several were returned by the developers asking for more information to enable them to reproduce the problem.
Which additional log items SHOULD you add to the TAS that would BEST improve failure analysis and defect reporting for future sprints?
a) Dynamic measurement information about the SUT.
b) A status of TAS error', in additional to pass' and 'fail', for each test case.
c) Use of a colour coding scheme so that 'pass' is in red and fail' is in green.
d) A counter to determine how many times each test case has been executed.
e) System configuration information including software/firmware and operating system versions.
f) A copy of the source code for all Keyword scripts executed.
- A. a and b
- B. a and c
- C. d and e
- D. b and e
Answer: D
Explanation:
Introducing a 'TAS error' status (b) would provide a clear distinction between failures caused by the SUT and those due to issues within the TAS itself, which is essential for accurate failure analysis and effective defect reporting. Including system configuration information (e), such as software/firmware and operating system versions, is also critical. This information can significantly aid developers in reproducing issues, as it provides context about the environment in which the test was executed.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer documents and training resources emphasize the importance of detailed logging for failure analysis and defect reporting. These resources advocate for clear categorization of test case outcomes and comprehensive recording of test environment configurations123.
NEW QUESTION # 33
You are working as a TAE for a company who are re-designing their website. The new website provides information for customers and there are two minor features being developed:
1) Request a newsletter
2) Ability to contact the organisation with a question or comment
The website must be "mobile friendly" and available on all major web browsers.
You have been tasked to provide an automated solution for web browsers only and to concentrate on the two minor features.
What would be a KEY challenge with automation in this context?
- A. Automation might not be possible on the mobile devices.
- B. Because there is a high level of intrusion there may be many false alarms.
- C. A low level of intrusion is likely from use of existing UI elements, but depending on the solution this might be more complex than a higher level of intrusion.
- D. The benefits of automation might not be achieved for many years due to the complexities of the SUT and automation solution.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The key challenge in this context is ensuring that the automated solution is compatible with mobile devices.
Since the website must be "mobile friendly," it is crucial that the automation covers the functionality on mobile platforms. However, automating tests for mobile browsers can be more complex due to the variety of devices, screen sizes, and operating systems. This complexity can make it challenging to ensure that the automation is effective across all potential user scenarios.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) documents and training resources provide comprehensive information on the challenges and considerations for test automation in a mobile-friendly context. These resources emphasize the importance of designing automation that is adaptable to different environments and can handle the intricacies of mobile platforms.
NEW QUESTION # 34
Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against the same version of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test environments.
Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?
The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts
The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format
C) Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested D) All the automated test cases contain the expected results E) The TAS components are under configuration management
- A. B and d
- B. B and c
- C. A and e
- D. A and d
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 35
You are working as a TAE for a company who have been using a web test execution tool for a number of years. The tool has been used successfully on ten web applications in the past.
The company are developing a new web application which has a friendly User Interface, but the developers have used an object throughout the application which the tool is unable to recognise. As a result, you have no way of capturing the object or verifying the contents using the automation tool.
What is the first thing you should do about this problem?
- A. Ask the developers if they can change the object to something that can be recognised by the tool
- B. Ask the developers to remove the object and replace it with some text fields
- C. See if the application can be run on a desktop and if the object can be recognised on the desktop by the tool.
- D. Investigate whether the object can be recognised by other test execution tools in the market
Answer: A
Explanation:
The first course of action when encountering an object recognition issue with a test automation tool is to collaborate with the development team to see if the object can be modified to be recognizable by the tool. This approach is often the most straightforward and least disruptive to existing test automation frameworks. It maintains the integrity of the test automation strategy while potentially providing a quick resolution to the object recognition problem. References = The ISTQB CT-TAE syllabus emphasizes the importance of addressing test automation issues by working within the existing test framework and collaborating with the development team to resolve issues123. Additionally, industry best practices suggest that modifying the application to be more automation-friendly is a common solution to such problems45.
NEW QUESTION # 36
You are using a gTAA to create a TAS for a project. The TAS is aimed specifically at automating a suit of existing manual test cases for standalone desktop applications. All the interfaces between the TAS and SUT will be from the CUI of the application.
Which of the following layers of the gTAA should you focus on for the TAS?
- A. The Test Definition layer
- B. The Test Execution layer
- C. The test Generation layer
- D. The Test Adaption layer
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 37
When the SUT provides interfaces that can then be used to perform actions on the SUT, what is this called?
SELECT ONE OPTION
- A. Observability
- B. Portability
- C. Maintainability
- D. Controllability
Answer: D
Explanation:
Controllability refers to the degree to which a system, such as the System Under Test (SUT), allows inputs to be injected in a controlled manner. When the SUT provides interfaces that can be used to perform actions on it, this characteristic is essential for test automation because it enables the test engineer to manipulate the system's state and behavior during testing. Controllability is crucial for ensuring that tests can be performed consistently and effectively, as it allows for precise control over the test conditions. References = ISTQB materials define controllability as a key attribute of a testable system. It is discussed in the context of test automation, particularly in relation to the interfaces provided by the SUT that allow for controlled manipulation during testing12.
NEW QUESTION # 38
You have been asked to determine a TAS for a new release of a SUT, test should be automated wherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.
What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?
- A. Automate tests at one level only, System level. Use only the newly developed interfaces and do not create any customized interfaces/test hooks.
- B. Automate the tests at two levels, Component and System level. Create customized hooks at Component level for interface not yet developed or amended. Only use the newly developed or amended interfaces to test at System level.
- C. Automate a test at once level, component level, Create customized interface/test hooks for this level where the interface has not yet been developed or amended.
- D. Automate tests at both Component and System Level. Only do this automation once every interface has been fully developed or amended and manual testing has completed successfully.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer guidelines emphasize the importance of a Test Automation Architecture (TAA) that is flexible and maintainable. In the scenario described, automating tests at both the Component and System levels allows for early detection of defects and continuous integration of changes.
Customized hooks at the Component level enable testing of interfaces that are under development, which is crucial for incremental delivery in Agile environments. Testing only the newly developed or amended interfaces at the System level ensures that the automation is focused on the changes that are most relevant to the release.
References = The answer is based on the principles outlined in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which discusses the design, development, and maintenance of test automation solutions, as well as the automation of dynamic functional tests and their relationship to test management, configuration management, defect management, software development processes, and quality assurance123.
NEW QUESTION # 39
......
REAL CT-TAE Exam Questions With 100% Refund Guarantee : https://www.preppdf.com/ISTQB/CT-TAE-prepaway-exam-dumps.html
Get Special Discount Offer on CT-TAE Dumps PDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UuV8DHa1sdOHNrwovQ6FJfGGoGy5yX1C