[Oct 19, 2025] IFSE Institute LLQP Real Exam Questions and Answers FREE
Pass IFSE Institute LLQP Exam Info and Free Practice Test
NEW QUESTION # 173
Emery is a healthy wife and mother of two who spends her days caring for her children and volunteering at the local food bank. Emery would like to purchase disability insurance coverage because she is worried about how she would be able to take care of her family if she becomes disabled.
What type of disability policy, if any, is likely to be issued to her?
- A. Cancellable policy.
- B. None. Emery is uninsurable.
- C. Guaranteed renewable policy.
- D. Non-traditional disability insurance.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Emery is a non-income earning individual, as she is a stay-at-home mother and volunteer. Traditional disability insurance policies, likeGuaranteed RenewableorCancellable policies, typically require proof of income and are generally issued to individuals who can demonstrate earned income. However,Non- traditional disability insurance policiesare often designed for individuals without a conventional source of earned income, such as homemakers, who may still wish to secure coverage against the potential loss of the ability to perform daily tasks due to disability.
Non-traditional policies may offer benefits that help cover the costs associated with hiring help or obtaining services that Emery could no longer provide if disabled. These types of policies acknowledge that a disability could impact Emery's ability to care for her family, even though she does not earn a regular income.
Therefore, option C is the best answer, as it aligns with the LLQP guidelines that recognize the suitability of non-traditional disability policies for individuals like Emery who have significant responsibilities but no formal income.
NEW QUESTION # 174
Angus is involved in a motorcycle accident and due to his injuries has to spend a few nights in the hospital.
He is released from the hospital with a doctor's note indicating that he is able to perform certain parts of his job, but that it would take months until he can be back to normal. He promptly calls his insurance agent Dawn to ask her if he would be entitled to his disability benefits. Dawn reads his policy and tells him that he will not receive any disability benefits.
Which disability definition is MOST LIKELY included in his policy?
- A. Total disability (according to the CPP)
- B. Own occupation
- C. Any occupation
- D. Regular occupation
Answer: C
Explanation:
The"any occupation"definition of disability is the most restrictive and generally requires that the insured be unable to perform any work for which they are reasonably qualified by education, training, or experience. If Angus's policy includes this definition, it would explain why he does not qualify for disability benefits despite being unable to perform parts of his job. Under this type of policy, unless he is unable to performany occupation, he would not be eligible for benefits. This is different from other definitions like "own occupation," which is less restrictive and provides benefits if the insured cannot perform their specific job duties.
NEW QUESTION # 175
Rowan works for a construction company that employs 40 employees. The company is newly established, and the owners have yet to implement a group insurance policy. Rowan falls off the side of a building and breaks his collar bone. The doctor informs him that he will be unable to work for five months.
Who will pay him disability benefits while he is recuperating?
- A. Canada Pension Plan.
- B. Workers' Compensation.
- C. Employment Insurance.
- D. His employer.
Answer: B
Explanation:
In this scenario, Rowan, an employee of a construction company, suffers an injury while on the job. Since the injury occurred in the workplace, he would be eligible for benefits under Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation is designed to cover employees who suffer work-related injuries or illnesses, providing them with benefits that include coverage for medical expenses and income replacement during their period of disability.
As the accident happened while Rowan was performing work duties, Workers' Compensation will likely cover his wage loss for the duration he is unable to work due to the injury. Employment Insurance (EI) would not be applicable here, as EI sickness benefits are intended for non-work-related illnesses or injuries. The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) also would not apply, as it provideslong-term disability benefits primarily for severe and prolonged disabilities that prevent individuals from working in any capacity. Therefore, option D is the correct answer, as Workers' Compensation is specifically designed for cases like Rowan's.
NEW QUESTION # 176
Molly took out a disability insurance policy. A few years after the purchase, she severely injured her back and was unable to work. She immediately filed a claim with her insurer to start receiving benefits. The insurer asked for an attending physician's statement (APS) describing her condition and stating when that condition started. Why is it important for the insurer to know on what date Molly became disabled?
- A. To determine when the 30-day survival period began.
- B. To determine when the waiting period began.
- C. To determine when the 30-day grace period began.
- D. To determine when the incontestability period began.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
Disability insurance policies typically include a waiting period (also called an elimination period), which is the time between the onset of disability and when benefits begin. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)notes that insurers require the date of disability onset-via an APS-to calculate this period (e.g., 30, 60, or 90 days). This ensures benefits are paid only after the waiting period elapses. A survival period (A) applies to life insurance, not disability. The incontestability period (B) relates to policy validity, not claimtiming. The grace period (C) pertains to premium payments. Knowing when Molly became disabled is critical for the waiting period, making D correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 3: Disability Insurance, Section on
"Waiting (Elimination) Period."
NEW QUESTION # 177
Last month, Suzanne purchased a life insurance policy from a local agent. The agent told her that the policy would accrue a cash value that she could draw from in her retirement years and that the premium would never increase. After recently meeting with a close friend, who is a retired insurance advisor, she was dismayed to learn that what was sold to her is in fact a term policy with no cash value. If Suzanne wishes to make a formal complaint against the agent, which authority can assist her in doing so?
- A. OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance.
- B. Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators.
- C. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
- D. Assuris.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
The agent's misrepresentation violates ethical standards. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)identifies the OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance (OLHI) as an independent body that assists consumers with complaints against insurance agents or companies when internal resolution fails.
Assuris (A) protects policyholders if an insurer fails, not for agent misconduct. The Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators (C) coordinates policy, not complaints. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (D) handles privacy issues, not misrepresentation. OLHI is the correct avenue for Suzanne, making B correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 4: Regulatory Environment, Section on "OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance."
NEW QUESTION # 178
(Ted purchased an IVIC 10 years ago. His original deposit was $10,000. The current market value is
$15,500 at maturity.
What will the new maturity guarantee be?)
- A. $10,000, with the new maturity date set 10 years from now.
- B. $12,000, with the new maturity date set 10 years from now.
- C. $11,625, and the new maturity date will depend on Ted's age.
- D. $15,500, and the new maturity date will depend on Ted's age.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Upon maturity,the new guarantee becomes the current market value, andthe new maturity date is based on contract terms, often depending on the ageof the client or a specific reset term.
Exact Extract:
"When a segregated fund contract matures, the new guarantee is based on the current market value, and a new maturity date is set according to the client's age or the insurer's terms." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.2 Growth Secured by Reset#45:0†Segfunds-E313-
2020-12-7ED.pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 179
Marsha and Alexis are equal partners in an advertising firm. They meet with Jose, an insurance agent, and Horacio, their lawyer, because they would like to protect themselves if one of them becomes disabled and unable to work for an extended period of time. At the end of their meeting, they agree to purchase $500,000 disability insurance policies on each other by each of them paying premiums.
What type of agreement do Marsha and Alexis have?
- A. Entity purchase agreement
- B. Business loan protection disability insurance
- C. Cross-purchase agreement
- D. Key person insurance
Answer: C
Explanation:
In across-purchase agreement, business partners purchase disability or life insurance policies on each other.
If one partner becomes disabled, the other partner uses the proceeds from the insurance to buy out the disabled partner's share in the business. Marsha and Alexis have agreed to purchase disability insurance policies on each other, with each paying the premium on the policy for their partner. This structure aligns with the cross-purchase format, where each partner independently holds the policy on the other, as described in LLQP materials on business continuation planning. The other options, such as an entity purchase agreement, involve the business purchasing the policy, which is not the case here.
NEW QUESTION # 180
After meeting with his advisor Monica, Tom agrees to apply for a $50,000 whole life insurance policy.
Monica tells him that the monthly premium will be $40 per month. Monica is advised by underwriting that Tom qualifies for an additional $10,000 critical illness rider, and that the new premium would be $50 per month. Monica advises underwriting that Tom accepts the additional coverage without speaking with him first, because it is such a good deal and great coverage, he won't mind. When Tom finds out what she has accepted on his behalf, without his knowledge, he is upset and wants to lodge a complaint to someone other than the insurance company and Monica; he wants to speak with an independent third party. He finds the contact information for the local regulatory authority. What are some of the responsibilities the regulatory authority has in protecting clients like Tom?
- A. Promoting transparency, reimbursing financial losses suffered by clients, and giving clients avenues to resolve individual complaints.
- B. Promoting transparency, taking action against breaches of conduct, and giving clients avenues to resolve individual complaints (e.g., OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance).
- C. Taking action against breaches of conduct, increasing the public's financial knowledge (such as understanding financial concepts), and closing insurance offices that are non-compliant.
- D. Promoting transparency, educating the public, and organizing class action lawsuits against insurers.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)outlines that provincial/territorial regulatory authorities oversee insurance agents and protect consumers by promoting transparency, enforcing ethical conduct, and facilitating dispute resolution. Monica's actions (accepting coverage without consent) breach client autonomy and disclosure rules. Regulatory authorities investigate such conduct and refer clients to independent bodies like the OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance for complaints. They don't reimburse losses (B), organize lawsuits (C), or focus solely on public education and office closures (D).
Option A aligns with their role, making it correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 4: Regulatory Environment, Section on "Role of Regulatory Authorities."
NEW QUESTION # 181
Alex is meeting with his financial advisor, Shannon, to discuss potential life insurance options. Alex's need for insurance will increase gradually over time due to growth on his investment properties. He would like the mortgages and taxable gains paid off if he were to pass away. Shannon recommends a permanent policy, as Alex's need is long-term, and could extend beyondany period of time a term policy would cover. Alex also wants to add an extra coverage onto this policy as he wants to be provided with additional growth over time he needs.
Which rider would work for Alex?
- A. Paid-up additions rider with restriction
- B. Term insurance rider
- C. Accidental death rider
- D. Guaranteed insurability benefit rider
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
APaid-up Additions (PUA) riderallows the insured to purchase additional insurance using policy dividends or lump-sum payments without medical underwriting. These additions are fully paid-up and accumulate cash value, offering additional long-term coverage and financial growth. The LLQP guide confirms PUAs are ideal for policyholders expecting insurance needs to increase or who want coverage that increases with inflation.
Reference: Insurance Study Guides Chinese.pdf, Life Insurance Riders - Paid-Up Additions
NEW QUESTION # 182
Aari and Jonila are a married couple in their late sixties. They both enjoy a comfortable retirement. Both receive regular payments from their pension plans, Old Age Security (OAS) and Canada Pension Plan (CPP).
They own a house and a cottage that are both mortgage-free. They also have over $500,000 in savings and investments. They know that if one of them dies, the surviving spouse will be financially comfortable. The couple has two grown children to whom they would like to leave all their assets when they die. The couple informs Herbert, their insurance agent, that they want to make sure when they die that their children have the funds needed to pay the taxes on the assets that they will bequeath them.
Which life insurance policy would be most suited to meet the couple's needs?
- A. A permanent joint first-to-die policy on Aari and Jonila.
- B. A term joint last-to-die policy on Aari and Jonila.
- C. A permanent joint last-to-die policy on Aari and Jonila.
- D. A term joint first-to-die policy on Aari and Jonila.
Answer: C
Explanation:
AJoint Last-to-Die policyis designed to pay out upon the death of the second insured, which is beneficial for covering estate taxes. This structure aligns with Aari and Jonila's goal to provide funds for their children to pay taxes on inherited assets. Permanent coverage ensures the policy remains in force until both spouses have passed away, which supports long-term estate planning needs. First-to-die policies would pay out upon the death of the first insured, which would not align with their objective to have the policy available for estate settlement at the second death.Therefore,Option Ais most suitable.
NEW QUESTION # 183
Following the death of her sister Sarah last year, Yesha, the liquidator of Sarah's estate, had been in contact with Sarah's insurance agent Monique on several occasions to claim the death benefit on Sarah's life insurance policy.
Yesterday, Yesha noticed that Sarah also had a disability insurance policy with a return of premium option which stated that a portion of the premiums can be reimbursed upon her death. Yesha contacted Monique again and asked her for more details about the disability policy and return of premium option but Monique replied that she could not help her as her firm had destroyed Sarah's files shortly after paying out the death benefit.
Did Sarah's firm act appropriately?
- A. Yes, because the life insurance company will still have a copy of the contract.
- B. Yes, because the death benefit was paid.
- C. No, because the file has to be kept for 7 years.
- D. No, because the file has to be kept for 5 years.
Answer: D
Explanation:
In the context of insurance, records related to client policies, including claims and relevant documentation, must generally be retained for a minimum of five years. This requirement ensures that firms maintain adequate records for review or potential claims and can support clients or their representatives in matters related to policy details.
Destroying Sarah's file shortly after paying out the death benefit would violate this five-year record retention requirement, which is part of standard industry practice for insurance providers. The requirement is intended to safeguard client information and provide continuity of service in case further details are needed post-claim.
NEW QUESTION # 184
Sasha is an employee at PranaTech. The company offers all employees a pension plan. PranaTech must contribute into the plan, but employee contributions are not mandatory. Sasha chooses where his funds will be invested.
- A. Defined contribution pension plan.
- B. Deferred profit sharing plan.
- C. Defined benefit pension plan.
- D. Group registered retirement savings plan.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Sasha's plan allows him to choose his own investments, and the company is required to contribute, while his own contributions are optional. This structure is indicative of a Defined Contribution Pension Plan (DCPP). In a DCPP, the employer contributes a fixed amount to the employee's retirement plan, and employees often have control over how their funds are invested. Employee contributions are typically voluntary, as outlined by LLQP guidelines on pension plans.
Options B, C, and D do not match because Defined Benefit Plans do not provide investment choice, DPSPs usually have discretionary employer contributions, and group RRSPs are not pension plans and typically involve mandatory employee contributions.
NEW QUESTION # 185
Ariana is a Vancouver restauranteur who owns a $250,000 universal life (UL) insurance policy with a cash surrender value that has grown considerably over the years. Unfortunately, her restaurant has fallen on hard times and in an effort to turn the business around, she takes out a string of business loans that she personally guaranteed. To protect her life insurance from creditors, she changes the beneficiary designation from her estate, naming her husband as a revocable beneficiary. Despite her efforts, the restaurant's profits do not improve, and she is forced to close her business and file for bankruptcy. Can her creditors seize her cash surrender value?
- A. Yes, because she changed her beneficiary designation to hinder creditors.
- B. Yes, because she has money accumulated in her cash surrender value.
- C. No, because the creditors can only go after the restaurant's assets.
- D. No, because her husband is a protected class beneficiary.
Answer: D
Explanation:
In most Canadian provinces, if a policyholder names a spouse as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, the cash surrender value of the policy is generally protected from creditors, as long as the spouse qualifies as a
"protected class" beneficiary. By designating her husband as a beneficiary, Ariana's policy benefits and cash surrender value are typically shielded from her personal creditors, even in the event of bankruptcy.
However, if she had named her estate as the beneficiary, the cash surrender value could have been subject to claims by creditors during her bankruptcy.
NEW QUESTION # 186
Edward and Shirley initiated a whole life insurance application for their daughter Christine when she was 15 years of age. As Christine was a student with limited income at the time, the agent set Edward and Shirley jointly as owning and paying the premiums of this policy. Edward was designated beneficiary. Who is the policyholder?
- A. Edward, as he is the designated beneficiary.
- B. Edward and Shirley, as they are designated owners of the policy.
- C. Edward and Shirley, as they are paying the premiums.
- D. Christine, as she is the life insured.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
In insurance terminology, the policyholder (or policy owner) is the person or entity that owns the insurance contract and has the legal rights to make decisions about it, such as changing beneficiaries or cancelling the policy. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)clearly distinguishes between the life insured (the person whose life is covered), the beneficiary (who receives the death benefit), and the policy owner. In this case, Edward and Shirley are explicitly designated as the joint owners of the policy, not merely premium payers. Christine, as the insured, has no ownership rights unless specified, and Edward's status as beneficiary does not confer ownership. Paying premiums does not automatically make someone the policyholder unless they are also the designated owner. Therefore, option D is correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 2: Insurance Contracts, Section on
"Policy Ownership and Roles."
NEW QUESTION # 187
The primary and secondary beneficiaries of Rachel and Chad's joint first-to-die permanent life insurance policy are each other and their adult children, respectively. Within a year of Rachel and Chad's divorce, Rachel unexpectedly passes away. The policy beneficiaries remained as originally designated. Whose claim will be paid by the insurer?
- A. Chad, as he was designated primary beneficiary.
- B. Rachel's parents, as Rachel and Chad were divorced.
- C. Chad and the couple's adult children jointly, as they were all designated as beneficiaries.
- D. The couple's adult children, as they submitted a claim before Chad.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
In a joint first-to-die policy, the death benefit is paid to the surviving insured (primary beneficiary)upon the first death, unless altered. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)states that beneficiary designations remain valid unless changed, and divorce does not automatically revoke them in most Canadian common law jurisdictions (unlike some family law contexts). Here, Chad is the primary beneficiary, and the adult children are secondary (contingent) beneficiaries, payable only if Chad predeceased Rachel. Since Rachel died first and the designation wasn't updated post-divorce, Chad receives the benefit.
Joint payment (A) or children claiming first (B) contradicts the primary/secondary structure, and Rachel's parents (D) have no standing. Thus, C is correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 2: Insurance Contracts, Section on
"Beneficiary Designations."
NEW QUESTION # 188
Andrew and Julie are married and are currently doing some tax and estate planning. They have acquired several properties over the years, many of which are rental properties. When Andrew and Julie pass away, they would like to pass these properties on to their kids. They realize there will be a large tax disposition on the final estate after they have both passed away and would like to fund that through a permanent life insurance strategy. They would like a simple solution and cash value is not important to them.
What type of life policy should Andrew and Julie consider purchasing?
- A. Joint first-to-die T100
- B. Joint last-to-die Whole Life
- C. Joint last-to-die T100
- D. Joint last-to-die Universal Life
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Joint last-to-die Term 100 (T100) is a cost-effective permanent insurance with no cash value that pays upon the second death. LLQP teaches that this is ideal when the focus is on estate liquidity (taxes on real estate, investments) without cash accumulation.
Reference: Insurance Study Guides Chinese.pdf, Term 100 and Estate Liquidity Needs
NEW QUESTION # 189
Laekyn purchased an individual disability insurance policy 3 years ago from Awah, her insurance agent.
Today, Awah receives a call from Laekyn, who says she is hospitalized following a suicide attempt. Laekyn says her doctor diagnosed her with bipolar disorder and expects she will be able to return to work in 3 months.
Will Awah be able to help Laekyn receive disability benefits?
- A. Yes, because the event occurred more than 2 years after the policy was purchased.
- B. Yes, because Laekyn contacted her as soon as she received her diagnosis.
- C. No, because she is disabled due to a suicide attempt.
- D. No, because the minimum waiting period on an individual disability policy is 90 days.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Most individual disability insurance policies include atwo-year incontestability clause, after which the insurer cannot deny claims due to misrepresentations on the application, unless they involve fraud. Since Laekyn's policy was purchased over three years ago, and assuming there was no fraudulent application, she should be eligible for benefits. The fact that her disability is related to a suicide attempt is not an automatic disqualification beyond this period unless specifically excluded by the policy. Therefore, the insurer should process her claim under the standard disability terms of the policy.
NEW QUESTION # 190
Pierre-Marc, aged 32, is a dentist with a rich clientele. His income is substantial. Five years ago, he purchased an "any occupation" disability insurance policy. Today he meets with Joseph, his life insurance agent, to determine whether this type of coverage is still adequate. What should Joseph tell him?
- A. This type of coverage is adequate because it is more flexible. Pierre-Marc will be entitled to disability benefits even if he can work in another profession and chooses to do so.
- B. This type of coverage is no longer adequate. Pierre-Marc should purchase an accidental death and dismemberment rider, which would allow him to collect a lump-sum benefit if he injures his hands.
- C. This type of coverage is no longer adequate. Pierre-Marc should purchase "own occupation" coverage, which would allow him to collect benefits even if he can work in another profession and chooses to do so.
- D. This type of coverage is adequate. Pierre-Marc will be entitled to disability benefits even if he can work in another profession, provided he chooses not to do so.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
"Any occupation" disability insurance pays benefits only if the insured cannot work inanyjob for which they are reasonably suited by education, training, or experience. For a dentist like Pierre-Marc, whose substantial income relies on specialized skills, this is restrictive. "Own occupation" coverage pays if he cannot perform his specific job (dentistry), even if he can work elsewhere (Chapter 2:Insurance to Protect Income).
Option A: Incorrect; "any occupation" is less flexible, not more, and doesn't pay if he can work elsewhere, regardless of choice.
Option B: Incorrect; benefits stop if he can work elsewhere, whether he chooses to or not.
Option C: Incorrect; an AD&D rider addresses specific losses, not income replacement adequacy.
Option D: Correct; "own occupation" suits his high-income, specialized profession, ensuring benefits if he can't practice dentistry, even if he takes another job.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 2:Insurance to Protect Income.
NEW QUESTION # 191
Pat, a 30-year-old youth worker, meets with his life insurance agent to discuss disability insurancecoverage.
After a thorough analysis of Pat's needs, the agent recommends a policy with a $1,500 a month benefit (50% of Pat's current salary) payable to age 65 after a 31-day waiting period. Pat has put enough money away to cover 6 months' worth of expenses, if necessary, but he would prefer not to dip into his savings. He applies for the policy, with the expectation that the premium will be $75 a month. He already thinks this is pricey and would not want to pay any more than that. Some time later, underwriting informs the agent that the policy has been approved, but with a 125% premium rating due to Pat being overweight. Which one of the following options would make the most sense to reduce the premium to a level Pat would accept without compromising too much on his coverage?
- A. Extend the benefit period.
- B. Have Pat reapply for coverage after losing the excess weight.
- C. Reduce the monthly benefit.
- D. Extend the waiting period.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
A 125% rating increases the $75 premium to $93.75. Extending the waiting period (e.g., to 90 days) lowers premiums while leveraging Pat's 6-month savings, maintaining $1,500/month to age 65 (Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs).
Option A: Correct; cost-effective adjustment.
Option B: Incorrect; reduces coverage.
Option C: Incorrect; increases premiums.
Option D: Impractical; delays coverage.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs.
NEW QUESTION # 192
(Ten years ago, Yamina invested $2,500 in a segregated fund contract with a 75%/100% guarantee structure. The market value of the contract peaked at $4,500 but then fell. Now, at maturity, the units are worth $2,250.
How much can Yamina expect to receive?)
- A. $1,875
- B. $2,250
- C. $2,500
- D. $3,375
Answer: C
Explanation:
With a75% maturity guarantee, Yamina is guaranteed to receive at least75% of the original investmentat maturity, regardless of market performance.
75% × $2,500 =$1,875, but because there is aresetpossibility if applicable and a100% death benefit guarantee, and if there had been any resets (not mentioned here), she would get the original amount$2,500 based on the basic guarantee.
Exact Extract:
"At maturity, if the market value is less than the guaranteed amount (typically 75% or 100% of the deposited amount), the maturity guarantee is paid." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1 Guarantees#33:4 Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.
pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 193
Arianna has been an insurance agent with Ideal Life for over 15 years, always working hard to grow her client base and keep her existing clients happy. Last week, she prepared an elaborate insurance plan for Raphael, a potential new client. But when they meet, Raphael tells her he wants a second opinion. Arianna tells him that she cannot allow him to show or discuss details of her work with a potential competitor. She explains it's wrong for another agent to benefit from her work and knowledge.
Which of the following standards of conduct did Arianna contravene?
- A. Duties and obligations towards the profession.
- B. Duties and obligations towards clients.
- C. Duties and obligations towards other representatives, firms, independent partnerships, insurers and financial institutions.
- D. Duties and obligations towards the public.
Answer: C
Explanation:
=
Arianna contravened the standard of conduct concerning her obligations towards other representatives. LLQP guidelines emphasize professional courtesy and fair competition, which means agents should not prevent clients from seeking second opinions or attempting to restrict their ability to consult with other representatives.
Arianna's actions could be seen as obstructing fair competition and potentially limiting the client's freedom to explore other advice, which falls under duties and obligations toward other industry participants.
Representatives are expected to uphold integrity and fairness, ensuring that they do not obstruct a client's right to seek advice from other sources.
NEW QUESTION # 194
Aaliyah is a 37-year-old account manager at a large pharmaceutical company. She earns $300,000 a year plus bonuses. She meets with Theo, an insurance agent, to review her life insurance needs. Theo deduces that Aaliyah needs a $250,000 universal life (UL) insurance policy. Aaliyah agrees but states that she wants to keep her premiums low. Which of the following UL death benefit options would BEST suit her needs?
- A. Level death benefit.
- B. Indexed death benefit.
- C. Level death benefit plus cumulative premiums.
- D. Level death benefit plus account value.
Answer: A
Explanation:
ALevel death benefitoption provides a fixed death benefit and is generally the least expensive premium option in Universal Life (UL) insurance. Since Aaliyah wants to keep her premiums low, this option best aligns with her needs. Other options like the death benefit plus account value or cumulative premiums increase the cost, as they provide a growing death benefit based on the policy's cash value or premiums paid.
Therefore,Option Awill help Aaliyah maintain lower premiums
NEW QUESTION # 195
Renato's new employer has just informed him that he is now eligible to join the company's group insurance plan. He could thus benefit from life, disability, and prescription drug coverage. Renato promptly fills out the paperwork to apply for the plan's basic coverage. Wondering if the process will involve medical underwriting at any point, he asks an agent from the group insurance provider. What should the agent tell him?
- A. Medical underwriting is required (retroactively) when filing a claim, but not upon application.
- B. No medical underwriting is required, neither upon application nor when filing a claim.
- C. Medical underwriting is required both upon application and when filing a claim.
- D. Medical underwriting is required upon application, but not when filing a claim.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Group plans typically waive medical underwriting for basic coverage upon enrollment (Chapter 8:Group Plan Specifics).
Option A: Incorrect; not standard.
Option B: Incorrect; not required at application.
Option C: Incorrect; no retroactive underwriting.
Option D: Correct; no underwriting for basic group coverage.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 8:Group Plan Specifics.
NEW QUESTION # 196
Wesley is a self-employed plumber. He meets with a licensed life insurance agent to explore his options regarding disability insurance. Wesley's earnings have been stable over the past few years.His business generates gross income of $120,000 annually and write-off expenses of $30,000. Wesley's average income tax rate is 30%. What income amount should be used to calculate the maximum disability benefits Wesley is entitled to?
- A. $63,000
- B. $90,000
- C. $120,000
- D. $84,000
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Disability insurance benefits are calculated based onnet incomeafter business expenses and taxes, as per the LLQP guidelines, to reflect the income actually available for living expenses (Chapter 2:Insurance to Protect Income).
Gross income: $120,000
Business expenses: $30,000
Net income before tax: $120,000 - $30,000 = $90,000
Tax rate: 30%
Tax payable: $90,000 × 0.30 = $27,000
Net income after tax: $90,000 - $27,000 = $63,000
The maximum disability benefit is typically based on this after-tax net income, often insurable up to 60-75% depending on the policy. $63,000 is the correct base amount for calculation, aligning with standard underwriting practices.
Option A ($120,000): Incorrect; uses gross income, not net.
Option B ($90,000): Incorrect; uses pre-tax net income, ignoring tax impact.
Option C ($84,000): Incorrect; no clear basis for this figure.
Option D ($63,000): Correct; reflects net income after expenses and taxes.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 2:Insurance to Protect Income.
NEW QUESTION # 197
(Ted purchased an IVIC 10 years ago. His original deposit was $10,000. The current market value is
$15,500 at maturity.
What will the new maturity guarantee be?)
- A. $10,000, with the new maturity date set 10 years from now.
- B. $12,000, with the new maturity date set 10 years from now.
- C. $11,625, and the new maturity date will depend on Ted's age.
- D. $15,500, and the new maturity date will depend on Ted's age.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Upon maturity,the new guarantee becomes the current market value, andthe new maturity date is based on contract terms, often depending on the ageof the client or a specific reset term.
Exact Extract:
"When a segregated fund contract matures, the new guarantee is based on the current market value, and a new maturity date is set according to the client's age or the insurer's terms." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.2 Growth Secured by Reset#45:0 Segfunds-E313-
2020-12-7ED.pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 198
......
Latest LLQP Exam Dumps IFSE Institute Exam: https://www.preppdf.com/IFSE-Institute/LLQP-prepaway-exam-dumps.html
New 2025 Latest Questions LLQP Dumps - Use Updated IFSE Institute Exam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zWMq7tn8AjX3bdHcvCuehyOXHhqEswBK